In April 2024, our Harford County Government posted a Facebook announcement inviting public input on how to spend the Opioid Restitution Fund–money from legal settlements with pharmaceutical companies responsible for the opioid crisis.
They held five community meetings across the county, stating:
“We want to hear your ideas for putting opioid restitution funds to use in our community.”
But here’s the problem: these meetings were poorly publicized and sparsely attended. Those who showed up were largely grassroots nonprofits–people with lived experience, doing the hard, often thankless work of helping those with substance use disorders find treatment and hope.
Noticeably absent? Our elected leaders, even in the districts where the meetings were held. Also absent, were the many parents whose perspectives are critical–especially those currently supporting a loved one in recovery or grieving the loss of one.
At one meeting, a mother shared her concern: her son was in a “recovery house” with no oversight. Some residents were still actively using drugs. Her fear was echoed by nonprofits present: many so-called treatment centers and sober homes–some even registered as 501(c)(3)s–are little more than profit-driven scams. While people in long-term recovery can often spot the frauds, vulnerable first-timers are at serious risk. And that risk can be fatal.
One attendee called the restitution fund “blood money.” It’s not far off. These are dollars paid out by those whose negligence and greed helped fuel an epidemic that has devastated families across Harford County.
So, what was suggested for how the funds should be used?
The consensus was clear:
- Support established, effective nonprofits.
- Fund treatment access for adults and adolescents.
- Combat stigma around those with substance use disorders and those in recovery.
- Help children impaired by parental substance use.
- Create 24/7 drop-in centers for those seeking help.
- Expand harm reduction and transportation services.
But in February 2025, when asked where the funds would go, the County Executive responded: toward “new” programs only. Existing nonprofits–the very ones working on the frontlines–– would only be considered if they proposed something new.
So why ask for community input at all, if the real decisions were already made behind closed doors? Who had a say? That’s a question the County has yet to answer.Note: If you’re in recovery, you can help by exposing the warning signs of fraudulent treatment centers. Don’t name names––just share the red flags. Your experience could save someone’s life.
